Riferimenti bibliografici: Interferenti endocrini

Riferimenti bibliografici: Interferenti endocrini

  • Testai, E.,Galli, C.L., Dekant, W., Marinovich, M., Piersma, A.H., Sharpe, R.M., 2013. A plea for risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicology
  • Endocrine disruption Fact or urban legend
  • The Health Risks of Chemicals in Personal Care
  • Personal care products and endocrine disruption A critical review
  • WHO – Endocrine disrupters
  • Database interferenti endocrini della Commissione Europea
  • FDA – Estrogenic Activity Database (si autoinstalla con Java)
  • TEDB della The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, Inc.
  • http://eng.mst.dk/topics/chemicals/endocrine-disruptors/the-eu-list-of-potential-endocrine-disruptors/
  • Human and wildlife exposures to EDCs -Karen A. Kidd, Georg Becher, Åke Bergman, Derek C.G. Muir and Tracey J. Woodruff
  • Endocrine disrupting chemicals
    – analysis of 66 everyday cosmetic and personal care products – BEUC
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences – Endocrine disruptors
  • National Institute of
    Environmental Health Sciences – Introduction: Endocrine disruptor
  • EEA -The impacts of endocrine disrupters on wildlife, people and their environments
  • Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
  • EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals
  • European commission: endocrine disrupter substances
  • European Commission Selection of chemical substances to be screened in the context of the impact assessment on criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
  • Evaluation of 22 SIN List 2.0 substances according to the Danish proposal on criteria for endocrine disrupters- DANISH CENTRE ON ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS
  • EFSA (2013). Scientific Opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors:
    scientific criteria for identification of endocrine disruptors and appropriateness of existing
    test methods for assessing effects mediated by these substances on human health and
    the environment. EFSA Journal 2013;11(3):3132. European Food Safety Authority.
  • JRC (2013a). JRC Scientific and Policy Reports: Key scientific issues relevant to the
    identification and characterisation of endocrine disrupting substances. Report of the
    Endocrine Disruptors Expert Advisory Group (Munn S & Goumeneau M, Eds.), Report.
    EUR 25919 EN (2013).
  • JRC (2013b). JRC Scientific and Policy Reports: Thresholds for endocrine disruptors and
    related uncertainties. Report of the Endocrine Disruptors Expert Advisory Group (Munn S
    & Goumeneau M, Eds.), Report. EUR 26068 EN (2013).
  • JRC (2014). JRC Scientific and Policy Reports: Alternative methods for regulatory
    toxicology – a state-of-the-art review. A. Worth, J. Barroso, S. Bremer, J. Burton, S.
    Casati, S. Coecke, R. Corvi, B. Desprez, C. Dumont, V. Gouliarmou, M. Goumenou, R
    Gräpel, C. Griesinger, M. Halder, A. Janusch Roi, A. Kienzler, F. Madia, S. Munn, M.
    Nepelska, A. Paini, A. Price, P. Prieto, A. Rolaki, M. Schäffer, J. Triebe, M. Whelan, C.
    Wittwehr, V. Zuang.
  • THE SCCS’S NOTES OF GUIDANCE SCCS/1501/12 FOR THE TESTING OF COSMETIC SUBSTANCES AND THEIR SAFETY EVALUATION
  • Natrue – Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Natural and
    Organic Cosmetics?
  • SCCNFP/0483/01: Opinion on the Evaluation of Potentially Estrogenic Effects of UV-filters adopted by the SCCNFP during the 17th Plenary meeting of 12 June 2001
    SCCP/1017/06: Opinion on Parabens (Colipa n° P82), adopted by the SCCP during the 9 plenary meeting of 10 October 2006.
    SCCP/1086/07: Opinion on Homosalate (Colipa n° S12), adopted by the SCCP during the 11 th plenary meeting of 21 March 2007.
    SCCP/1183/08: Opinion on 4-Methylbenzylidene camphor, 4-MBC (Colipa n° P82), adopted by the SCCP during the 16 th plenary of 24 June 2008.
    SCCP/1184/08: Opinion on Parabens (Colipa n° S60), adopted by the SCCP during the 16 th plenary of 24 June 2008.
    SCCS/1544/14
    SCCP/1192/08: Opinion on Triclosan (Colipa n° P32), adopted by the SCCP during the 19 th plenary meeting of 21 January 2009.
    SCCS/1501/12: The SCCS’s notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic substances and their safety evaluation 8th revision. The SCCS adopted this opinion at its 17th plenary meeting of 11 December 2012.
    SCCS/1241/10: Opinion on Cyclomethicone – Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (Cyclotetrasiloxane, D4) and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (Cyclopentasiloxane, D5), adopted by the SCCS during the 7 th plenary meeting of 22 June 2010.
    SCCS/1294/10: Memorandum on alternative test methods in human health safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients in the European Union, adopted by the SCCS during the 5 th plenary meeting of 8 December 2009.
    SCCS/1348/10: Opinion on Parabens (Colipa n° P82), adopted by the SCCS during the 9 th plenary meeting of 14 December 2010.
    SCCS/1414/11: Opinion on Triclosan (Colipa n° P32) – Addendum to the SCCP opinion on plenary meeting of 22 March 2011.
    SCCS/1446/11: Clarification on Opinion SCCS/1348/10 in the light of the Danish clause of safeguard banning the use of parabens in cosmetic products intended for children under three years of age, adopted by the SCCS by written procedure on 10 October 2011.
    SCCS/1513/13: Opinion on 3-Benzylidene camphor (Colipa n° S61), adopted by the SCCS during the 2 nd plenary meeting of 18 June 2010.
    SCCS/1514/13: Opinion on Parabens – Updated request for a scientific opinion on propyl-and butylparaben (Colipa n° P82), adopted by written procedure on 3 May 2013.

    I commenti, le testimonianze e le opinioni sono sempre graditi. I programmi anti-spam possono far si che il commento sia visibile nel blog solo dopo approvazione. Per inserire nei commenti un link, rimuovere http:// e www. I commenti con argomentazioni ad personam, promozionali o non pertinenti verranno cancellati. Non è questa la sede per supportare le proprie tifoserie, fedi o ideologie.

    Commenta

    L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

    *

    Choose a Rating